<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Google Case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=13490</link>
    <description>Confidentiality of information in regulatory investigations is the central issue: a writ petition challenged information requests in a competition probe while media reports alleged a stayed penalty, but the regulator had not imposed any penalty, rendering a stay inapplicable; the court considered protection of confidential materials after hearing counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:17:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:17:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Google Case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=13490</link>
      <description>Confidentiality of information in regulatory investigations is the central issue: a writ petition challenged information requests in a competition probe while media reports alleged a stayed penalty, but the regulator had not imposed any penalty, rendering a stay inapplicable; the court considered protection of confidential materials after hearing counsel.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:17:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=13490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>