<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 569 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252435</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving the interpretation of taxable value for service tax calculation. The service station demonstrated through VAT assessment orders that the disputed amount related to the sale of spare parts and consumables, entitling them to the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The tribunal clarified that spare parts used in servicing vehicles are considered inputs for providing the service, allowing the service provider to take input credit for excise duty and service tax paid on such parts. The respondent&#039;s presentation of VAT assessment orders successfully established the nature of transactions, leading to the exclusion of the disputed amount from the service tax calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 569 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252435</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving the interpretation of taxable value for service tax calculation. The service station demonstrated through VAT assessment orders that the disputed amount related to the sale of spare parts and consumables, entitling them to the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The tribunal clarified that spare parts used in servicing vehicles are considered inputs for providing the service, allowing the service provider to take input credit for excise duty and service tax paid on such parts. The respondent&#039;s presentation of VAT assessment orders successfully established the nature of transactions, leading to the exclusion of the disputed amount from the service tax calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>