<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 547 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252413</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening assessment beyond the four-year period as it lacked specific indication of undisclosed material facts, relying on precedents emphasizing the necessity of such disclosure for valid reopening. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the notice, and disposed of related proceedings without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 547 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252413</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening assessment beyond the four-year period as it lacked specific indication of undisclosed material facts, relying on precedents emphasizing the necessity of such disclosure for valid reopening. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the notice, and disposed of related proceedings without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>