<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 520 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252386</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner for reconsideration. The Tribunal found that the appellant was entitled to the abatement of service tax beyond the date specified by the Commissioner, as per subsequent notifications. It directed the Assistant Commissioner to properly assess the appellant&#039;s compliance with the relevant notifications and consider their submissions. The stay petition and appeal were resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:09:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 520 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252386</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner for reconsideration. The Tribunal found that the appellant was entitled to the abatement of service tax beyond the date specified by the Commissioner, as per subsequent notifications. It directed the Assistant Commissioner to properly assess the appellant&#039;s compliance with the relevant notifications and consider their submissions. The stay petition and appeal were resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>