<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 517 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252383</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant by setting aside the demand for interest on service tax not remitted timely. The judgment emphasized the necessity of assessing the legality of the principal amount before enforcing interest payments, particularly in situations involving retrospective amendments impacting tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 517 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252383</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant by setting aside the demand for interest on service tax not remitted timely. The judgment emphasized the necessity of assessing the legality of the principal amount before enforcing interest payments, particularly in situations involving retrospective amendments impacting tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>