<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 510 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252376</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT Bangalore, allowed the condonation of a 6-day delay in filing appeals after a satisfactory explanation was provided. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the availing of Cenvat credit without receiving inputs, granting a waiver of balance dues due to discrepancies and lack of concrete evidence against them. Verification issues with transporters and records led to a stay against recovery, with the Tribunal concluding that the appellant made a case for the waiver of balance dues. The deposit made by the appellant was considered a pre-deposit, and the balance dues were waived to provide relief during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:44:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 510 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252376</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT Bangalore, allowed the condonation of a 6-day delay in filing appeals after a satisfactory explanation was provided. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the availing of Cenvat credit without receiving inputs, granting a waiver of balance dues due to discrepancies and lack of concrete evidence against them. Verification issues with transporters and records led to a stay against recovery, with the Tribunal concluding that the appellant made a case for the waiver of balance dues. The deposit made by the appellant was considered a pre-deposit, and the balance dues were waived to provide relief during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>