https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252374 The court dismissed the Writ Petitions, holding that Regulation 5(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009, is applicable to the Petitioners, is constitutionally valid under both the Customs Act and the Constitution of India, and that the demand notices for cost recovery charges were valid. The court emphasized the necessity of the regulation for the efficient functioning of Customs areas and the uniform application of the law to all custodians. en-us Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252374 The court dismissed the Writ Petitions, holding that Regulation 5(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009, is applicable to the Petitioners, is constitutionally valid under both the Customs Act and the Constitution of India, and that the demand notices for cost recovery charges were valid. The court emphasized the necessity of the regulation for the efficient functioning of Customs areas and the uniform application of the law to all custodians. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252374