<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 493 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252359</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, directing the Tax Authorities to re-examine specific comparables and recompute deductions under Section 10A, ensuring compliance with legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized functional differences in comparables and accurate computation of segmental revenues, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 493 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252359</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, directing the Tax Authorities to re-examine specific comparables and recompute deductions under Section 10A, ensuring compliance with legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized functional differences in comparables and accurate computation of segmental revenues, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>