<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 491 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act on the assessee for concealment of income. Despite the voluntary surrender of additional income, the Tribunal found the disclosure was not truly voluntary as it occurred after the department identified discrepancies. Legal precedents were cited to support the penalty imposition, emphasizing that surrendering income after being confronted does not constitute voluntary disclosure. The penalty was reduced from 200% to the minimum rate of 100% to Rs. 2,32,058, with the appeal dismissed on merits but the penalty reduced to the statutory minimum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 491 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act on the assessee for concealment of income. Despite the voluntary surrender of additional income, the Tribunal found the disclosure was not truly voluntary as it occurred after the department identified discrepancies. Legal precedents were cited to support the penalty imposition, emphasizing that surrendering income after being confronted does not constitute voluntary disclosure. The penalty was reduced from 200% to the minimum rate of 100% to Rs. 2,32,058, with the appeal dismissed on merits but the penalty reduced to the statutory minimum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>