<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 484 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252350</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the order passed by the authorities on the petitioner&#039;s representation was a speaking order on the refund application. The Court directed the petitioner to proceed with an appeal before the Tribunal to challenge the order dated 7th March, 2014, ensuring a decision on the appeal&#039;s merits in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized that the appeal should be decided on its own merits and in compliance with legal procedures, ultimately disposing of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 484 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252350</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the order passed by the authorities on the petitioner&#039;s representation was a speaking order on the refund application. The Court directed the petitioner to proceed with an appeal before the Tribunal to challenge the order dated 7th March, 2014, ensuring a decision on the appeal&#039;s merits in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized that the appeal should be decided on its own merits and in compliance with legal procedures, ultimately disposing of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>