<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 476 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner, directing the appellant to make a pre-deposit and stay the recovery of the balance during the appeal process. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and the prescribed formula for determining Cenvat credit reversals, clarifying the interpretation of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 476 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner, directing the appellant to make a pre-deposit and stay the recovery of the balance during the appeal process. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and the prescribed formula for determining Cenvat credit reversals, clarifying the interpretation of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>