<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on interest expenses and the computation of deduction under section 80HHC. However, it remitted the issues of publicity and advertisement expenses, sales promotion expenses, and prior period expenses back to the AO for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for the AO to examine the additional evidence provided by the assessee. The appeals of the Revenue were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2014 06:27:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on interest expenses and the computation of deduction under section 80HHC. However, it remitted the issues of publicity and advertisement expenses, sales promotion expenses, and prior period expenses back to the AO for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for the AO to examine the additional evidence provided by the assessee. The appeals of the Revenue were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>