<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 462 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the re-computation of the arm&#039;s length price and disallowance of referral fees, citing precedents. The issue of disallowance under section 43B was sent back to the AO for verification. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with no specific discussion on penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2014 06:26:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 462 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the re-computation of the arm&#039;s length price and disallowance of referral fees, citing precedents. The issue of disallowance under section 43B was sent back to the AO for verification. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with no specific discussion on penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>