<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 460 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the TPO to adopt a combined transaction approach for determining the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) and to identify suitable comparables for royalty payments. It emphasized that the TPO cannot set the ALP at NIL based on perceived lack of economic benefit and must use recognized methods under the Act. The Tribunal found the TPO&#039;s determinations unsustainable, requiring proper evaluation of technology support and related intangibles received by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 460 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the TPO to adopt a combined transaction approach for determining the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) and to identify suitable comparables for royalty payments. It emphasized that the TPO cannot set the ALP at NIL based on perceived lack of economic benefit and must use recognized methods under the Act. The Tribunal found the TPO&#039;s determinations unsustainable, requiring proper evaluation of technology support and related intangibles received by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>