https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252321 The Tribunal found that the appellant's rights to natural justice were violated as they were not provided with the verification report for comments/rebuttal, leading to procedural irregularities. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for the appellant to respond to the report and present evidence supporting their claim of correctly discharging the service tax liability. The penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside, and the appellant was granted the opportunity to rebut the report and present their case, ensuring a fair process in line with principles of natural justice. en-us Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252321 The Tribunal found that the appellant's rights to natural justice were violated as they were not provided with the verification report for comments/rebuttal, leading to procedural irregularities. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for the appellant to respond to the report and present evidence supporting their claim of correctly discharging the service tax liability. The penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside, and the appellant was granted the opportunity to rebut the report and present their case, ensuring a fair process in line with principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252321