<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 446 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252312</link>
    <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioner, a 100% Export Oriented Unit, in their claim for a refund of terminal excise duty under the Foreign Trade Policy. The Court emphasized the requirement for a proper speaking order and adherence to principles of natural justice in rejecting refund applications. The petitioner&#039;s plea for a personal hearing and detailed order addressing all contentions was upheld. The Court directed the authorities to issue a new order within eight weeks, considering all submissions and refraining from relying solely on previous communications. The judgment underscored the importance of procedural fairness and detailed reasoning in handling refund applications under the policy circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 446 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252312</link>
      <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioner, a 100% Export Oriented Unit, in their claim for a refund of terminal excise duty under the Foreign Trade Policy. The Court emphasized the requirement for a proper speaking order and adherence to principles of natural justice in rejecting refund applications. The petitioner&#039;s plea for a personal hearing and detailed order addressing all contentions was upheld. The Court directed the authorities to issue a new order within eight weeks, considering all submissions and refraining from relying solely on previous communications. The judgment underscored the importance of procedural fairness and detailed reasoning in handling refund applications under the policy circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>