https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252304 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, disposing of the stay petition. It found that the imposition of anti-dumping duty under serial No. 5, which excluded China PR, was unsustainable as the goods were imported from the People's Republic of China. This decision resulted in the waiver of pre-deposit of anti-dumping duty, penalty, and fine sought by the applicant, resolving the dispute over liability to pay anti-dumping duty under the Customs Act. en-us Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:18:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252304 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, disposing of the stay petition. It found that the imposition of anti-dumping duty under serial No. 5, which excluded China PR, was unsustainable as the goods were imported from the People's Republic of China. This decision resulted in the waiver of pre-deposit of anti-dumping duty, penalty, and fine sought by the applicant, resolving the dispute over liability to pay anti-dumping duty under the Customs Act. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252304