<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to dismiss the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO). The Tribunal found the assessee adequately explained the unexplained credits, supported the reasonableness of disallowed expenses with evidence, and demonstrated consistency in household withdrawals. The order was pronounced on 04.09.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to dismiss the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO). The Tribunal found the assessee adequately explained the unexplained credits, supported the reasonableness of disallowed expenses with evidence, and demonstrated consistency in household withdrawals. The order was pronounced on 04.09.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>