<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 414 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252280</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to the contravention of Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules and remanded the matter regarding the Cenvat credit availed on sales commission for determination of the actual credit taken by the appellant. The penalty was waived due to the appellant&#039;s reasonable belief in the admissibility of credit in the sales contract and AMC scenario.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 414 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252280</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to the contravention of Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules and remanded the matter regarding the Cenvat credit availed on sales commission for determination of the actual credit taken by the appellant. The penalty was waived due to the appellant&#039;s reasonable belief in the admissibility of credit in the sales contract and AMC scenario.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>