https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252275 The Tribunal rejected the appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the remand of a case and subsequent orders, while allowing the appeal filed by the appellant regarding the disallowance of credit of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Secondary Cess under Rule 3(7) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment clarified the Commissioner (Appeals)' jurisdiction to remand cases and affirmed the appellant's eligibility for CENVAT Credit, emphasizing that the restrictions did not apply to goods not produced or manufactured by the appellant's 100% EOU. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252275 The Tribunal rejected the appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the remand of a case and subsequent orders, while allowing the appeal filed by the appellant regarding the disallowance of credit of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Secondary Cess under Rule 3(7) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment clarified the Commissioner (Appeals)' jurisdiction to remand cases and affirmed the appellant's eligibility for CENVAT Credit, emphasizing that the restrictions did not apply to goods not produced or manufactured by the appellant's 100% EOU. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252275