<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 405 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252271</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the Calcutta High Court and the Arbitrator, dismissing the appellant&#039;s challenge to the arbitration award. The Court emphasized the finality of the Arbitrator&#039;s decision, noting that it should only be set aside if patently illegal or erroneous. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding contract interpretation and public policy considerations were rejected, with the Court finding no merit in the allegations of patent illegality or perversity in the award. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 405 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252271</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the Calcutta High Court and the Arbitrator, dismissing the appellant&#039;s challenge to the arbitration award. The Court emphasized the finality of the Arbitrator&#039;s decision, noting that it should only be set aside if patently illegal or erroneous. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding contract interpretation and public policy considerations were rejected, with the Court finding no merit in the allegations of patent illegality or perversity in the award. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>