<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252268</link>
    <description>HC held that the employer is entitled to deduction under amended s.43B only if the contribution to the employee welfare fund stood credited on or before the due date; mere payment after the due date does not qualify. The court affirmed that both employees&#039; and employer&#039;s contributions fall within the scope of the amendment to s.43B. The Tribunal correctly applied the benefits of s.43B, and the decision was rendered against the revenue, following the relevant SC precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252268</link>
      <description>HC held that the employer is entitled to deduction under amended s.43B only if the contribution to the employee welfare fund stood credited on or before the due date; mere payment after the due date does not qualify. The court affirmed that both employees&#039; and employer&#039;s contributions fall within the scope of the amendment to s.43B. The Tribunal correctly applied the benefits of s.43B, and the decision was rendered against the revenue, following the relevant SC precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>