<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 395 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252261</link>
    <description>HC held that Section 153(2A) applies to a fresh block assessment under Chapter XIV-B made pursuant to an order under Section 250, because Section 158BH permits other Act provisions to fill gaps in Chapter XIV-B. The appellate order was communicated on 15.01.2001, so the one-year limitation under Section 153(2A) expired on 31.03.2002; the fresh assessment dated 28.03.2003 therefore exceeded the statutory period and was time-barred. The decision was against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 395 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252261</link>
      <description>HC held that Section 153(2A) applies to a fresh block assessment under Chapter XIV-B made pursuant to an order under Section 250, because Section 158BH permits other Act provisions to fill gaps in Chapter XIV-B. The appellate order was communicated on 15.01.2001, so the one-year limitation under Section 153(2A) expired on 31.03.2002; the fresh assessment dated 28.03.2003 therefore exceeded the statutory period and was time-barred. The decision was against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>