<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 387 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 1,01,500 imposed on the appellant for delayed filing of service tax returns was not sustainable in law. The Tribunal noted that the maximum penalty during the relevant period was &amp;amp;8377; 2,000 per return, totaling &amp;amp;8377; 12,000 for six returns, which was below the amount imposed. As a result, the Tribunal granted waiver from pre-deposit of the dues and stayed recovery during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 387 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 1,01,500 imposed on the appellant for delayed filing of service tax returns was not sustainable in law. The Tribunal noted that the maximum penalty during the relevant period was &amp;amp;8377; 2,000 per return, totaling &amp;amp;8377; 12,000 for six returns, which was below the amount imposed. As a result, the Tribunal granted waiver from pre-deposit of the dues and stayed recovery during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>