<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 384 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, a small service provider, was not liable to pay Service Tax for specific financial years for maintenance and repair services, allowing a refund for those periods. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant regarding exemption limits under Service Tax for different financial years, granting a refund for periods where the turnover was below the exemption limit. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, concluding that the appellant was not in violation of the Act or Rules and was entitled to a refund for the relevant periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 384 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, a small service provider, was not liable to pay Service Tax for specific financial years for maintenance and repair services, allowing a refund for those periods. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant regarding exemption limits under Service Tax for different financial years, granting a refund for periods where the turnover was below the exemption limit. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, concluding that the appellant was not in violation of the Act or Rules and was entitled to a refund for the relevant periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>