<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252249</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the lower appellate authority after condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The appellant&#039;s explanation for the delay, based on the non-receipt of the order, was accepted, leading to the condonation of the delay and a decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:51:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252249</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the lower appellate authority after condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The appellant&#039;s explanation for the delay, based on the non-receipt of the order, was accepted, leading to the condonation of the delay and a decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>