<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252234</link>
    <description>A stock exchange member&#039;s nomination right was treated as a personal privilege, so once default occurred the right ceased to vest in the member and the sale proceeds of its exercise were not the member&#039;s property and could not be attached for income-tax recovery. By contrast, securities, margin money and other deposited assets remained the member&#039;s assets subject to the exchange&#039;s control and were therefore attachable under the recovery provisions. The exchange&#039;s first and paramount lien over member securities made it a secured creditor, and that prior secured claim had priority over government dues, which prevail only against unsecured creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:36:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252234</link>
      <description>A stock exchange member&#039;s nomination right was treated as a personal privilege, so once default occurred the right ceased to vest in the member and the sale proceeds of its exercise were not the member&#039;s property and could not be attached for income-tax recovery. By contrast, securities, margin money and other deposited assets remained the member&#039;s assets subject to the exchange&#039;s control and were therefore attachable under the recovery provisions. The exchange&#039;s first and paramount lien over member securities made it a secured creditor, and that prior secured claim had priority over government dues, which prevail only against unsecured creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>