https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166618 The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in entertaining a writ petition challenging the orders of the Registrar and the First Additional District Judge, as the statutory remedy of appeal had not been exhausted. The court set aside the High Court's orders, reinstated the District Judge's order, and allowed the contesting respondents to file a civil suit within three months to establish their rights. Appellants were awarded costs. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166618 The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in entertaining a writ petition challenging the orders of the Registrar and the First Additional District Judge, as the statutory remedy of appeal had not been exhausted. The court set aside the High Court's orders, reinstated the District Judge's order, and allowed the contesting respondents to file a civil suit within three months to establish their rights. Appellants were awarded costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166618