https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107476 Dispute concerns the levy of Central Sales Tax on gear boxes supplied to an SEZ unit that assembles them into exported nacelles. The vendor charged CST because purchase orders issued by the foreign parent prevented obtaining Form I; the SEZ unit paid CST despite holding export documentation for finished goods. The note seeks guidance on exemption eligibility for inputs used in exports, evidentiary proof requirements, consequences of foreign parent purchase orders, and prospects for reimbursement or future avoidance of CST, noting a budget announcement of a high level committee to review complex cross border tax issues. en-us Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:50:43 +0530 Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107476 Dispute concerns the levy of Central Sales Tax on gear boxes supplied to an SEZ unit that assembles them into exported nacelles. The vendor charged CST because purchase orders issued by the foreign parent prevented obtaining Form I; the SEZ unit paid CST despite holding export documentation for finished goods. The note seeks guidance on exemption eligibility for inputs used in exports, evidentiary proof requirements, consequences of foreign parent purchase orders, and prospects for reimbursement or future avoidance of CST, noting a budget announcement of a high level committee to review complex cross border tax issues. Discussion-Forum Customs Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:50:43 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107476