<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 333 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252199</link>
    <description>Restricted goods imported into a customs bonded warehouse solely for re-export were treated as outside the registration regime under the Insecticides Act, 1968, because the import was not for home consumption. Read with the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14, the statutory scheme was held not to apply to such bonded imports, and the supporting customs-bond position and DGFT clarification were relied on. On that basis, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside, and the importer obtained consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 333 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252199</link>
      <description>Restricted goods imported into a customs bonded warehouse solely for re-export were treated as outside the registration regime under the Insecticides Act, 1968, because the import was not for home consumption. Read with the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14, the statutory scheme was held not to apply to such bonded imports, and the supporting customs-bond position and DGFT clarification were relied on. On that basis, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside, and the importer obtained consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>