<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 318 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252184</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the revenue for AY 2005-06 to 2007-08 were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. However, the appeal for AY 2008-09 was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the issue of Work in Progress remanded back to the AO for fresh examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 318 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252184</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the revenue for AY 2005-06 to 2007-08 were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. However, the appeal for AY 2008-09 was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the issue of Work in Progress remanded back to the AO for fresh examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>