<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 303 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s default in paying Central Excise duty beyond the allowed period, requiring duty payment without utilizing Cenvat credit. The appellant paid interest on the defaulted amount and a penalty of &amp;amp;8377;1,00,000. Due to the appellant&#039;s inability to deposit cash, interest payment was deemed compliant with the rules. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal reduced the penalty to the already paid amount, finding it sufficient. The appeal and stay application were decided accordingly, ensuring compliance with Central Excise Rules and considering the appellant&#039;s actions and payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 303 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s default in paying Central Excise duty beyond the allowed period, requiring duty payment without utilizing Cenvat credit. The appellant paid interest on the defaulted amount and a penalty of &amp;amp;8377;1,00,000. Due to the appellant&#039;s inability to deposit cash, interest payment was deemed compliant with the rules. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal reduced the penalty to the already paid amount, finding it sufficient. The appeal and stay application were decided accordingly, ensuring compliance with Central Excise Rules and considering the appellant&#039;s actions and payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>