<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 269 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166607</link>
    <description>Imported stainless steel shafts were correctly classified on the basis of the invoice description, which sufficiently established their commercial identity and tariff character. On that description, the goods fell under the entry for bars and rods rather than the higher-rated entries for plates, sheets, flats, skelp or strips, and further documentary proof was not required. The lower rate of additional duty therefore applied, and the refund claim succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:14:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 269 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166607</link>
      <description>Imported stainless steel shafts were correctly classified on the basis of the invoice description, which sufficiently established their commercial identity and tariff character. On that description, the goods fell under the entry for bars and rods rather than the higher-rated entries for plates, sheets, flats, skelp or strips, and further documentary proof was not required. The lower rate of additional duty therefore applied, and the refund claim succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>