<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 273 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; orders, dismissing the appeal due to the appellants&#039; failure to comply with the 6-month time limit for filing the refund claim under the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment emphasized the importance of timely compliance with statutory provisions and clarified the distinction between individuals and companies for such legal purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 273 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; orders, dismissing the appeal due to the appellants&#039; failure to comply with the 6-month time limit for filing the refund claim under the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment emphasized the importance of timely compliance with statutory provisions and clarified the distinction between individuals and companies for such legal purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>