https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166584 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the importation was not covered by the license due to non-compliance with the period of shipment requirements. The contract was deemed voidable, allowing the appellant to seek compensation for losses. The judgment highlights the significance of adhering to licensing conditions and contractual obligations in import transactions, emphasizing the importance of the period of shipment in import licensing agreements. en-us Sat, 21 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166584 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the importation was not covered by the license due to non-compliance with the period of shipment requirements. The contract was deemed voidable, allowing the appellant to seek compensation for losses. The judgment highlights the significance of adhering to licensing conditions and contractual obligations in import transactions, emphasizing the importance of the period of shipment in import licensing agreements. Case-Laws Customs Sat, 21 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166584