<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 285 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252151</link>
    <description>The appeal was admitted by the court, directing it to be listed for final hearing. The judgment clarified the application of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, regarding availing credit exceeding the cap, emphasizing the treatment of excess credit and interest liability. The court highlighted the legal question on the rule&#039;s interpretation, leading to the admission of the appeal despite the amount being less than &amp;amp;8377; 50,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 22:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 285 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252151</link>
      <description>The appeal was admitted by the court, directing it to be listed for final hearing. The judgment clarified the application of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, regarding availing credit exceeding the cap, emphasizing the treatment of excess credit and interest liability. The court highlighted the legal question on the rule&#039;s interpretation, leading to the admission of the appeal despite the amount being less than &amp;amp;8377; 50,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>