https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252145 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI was allowed, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal dismissing the appeal of M/s. Krishna Developers for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of written communication for pre-deposit orders under Section 37C of the Act, directing the lower appellate authority to reconsider the case. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the maintenance of status quo to prevent coercive action against the appellant during reconsideration, ensuring procedural fairness and statutory compliance. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Oct 2014 21:55:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252145 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI was allowed, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal dismissing the appeal of M/s. Krishna Developers for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of written communication for pre-deposit orders under Section 37C of the Act, directing the lower appellate authority to reconsider the case. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the maintenance of status quo to prevent coercive action against the appellant during reconsideration, ensuring procedural fairness and statutory compliance. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252145