<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 271 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252137</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellants for non-payment of excise duty on imported zinc dross under Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal found that the appellants did not need to pay the duty as the imported zinc dross was of low quality and no countervailing duty was paid on it. The tribunal concluded that the invocation of Rule 6 was unjustified, granting relief to the appellants and overturning the decision of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 271 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252137</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellants for non-payment of excise duty on imported zinc dross under Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal found that the appellants did not need to pay the duty as the imported zinc dross was of low quality and no countervailing duty was paid on it. The tribunal concluded that the invocation of Rule 6 was unjustified, granting relief to the appellants and overturning the decision of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>