<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 249 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252115</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel penalties under sections 271(1)(a) and 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The Court found that the delay in filing returns was adequately explained due to complexities in the firm&#039;s assessment process, changes in constitution, and dissolution. The Court concluded that there was no justification for imposing penalties and dismissed the appeals without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 249 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252115</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel penalties under sections 271(1)(a) and 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The Court found that the delay in filing returns was adequately explained due to complexities in the firm&#039;s assessment process, changes in constitution, and dissolution. The Court concluded that there was no justification for imposing penalties and dismissed the appeals without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>