https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252110 The Tribunal treated the deposited amount as sufficient security for interim protection and stayed recovery of the remaining demand pending final disposal of the appeal. It noted that the merits, including whether the contracts were composite contracts or separable supply and service contracts, remained contentious and required adjudication at the final hearing. On that basis, the balance demand was not enforced during the appeal. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:25:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252110 The Tribunal treated the deposited amount as sufficient security for interim protection and stayed recovery of the remaining demand pending final disposal of the appeal. It noted that the merits, including whether the contracts were composite contracts or separable supply and service contracts, remained contentious and required adjudication at the final hearing. On that basis, the balance demand was not enforced during the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252110