<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 243 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority for verification of the appellant&#039;s payment of service tax through CENVAT credit. The Tribunal emphasized granting the appellant a reasonable opportunity of hearing before a new decision is made. The impugned order was set aside, and the stay application was disposed of. The miscellaneous application for stay of recovery of dues was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 243 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority for verification of the appellant&#039;s payment of service tax through CENVAT credit. The Tribunal emphasized granting the appellant a reasonable opportunity of hearing before a new decision is made. The impugned order was set aside, and the stay application was disposed of. The miscellaneous application for stay of recovery of dues was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>