<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 233 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252099</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Condonation of Delay application and dismissed the appeal as time-barred. The appellant&#039;s plea of pregnancy and childbirth causing the delay was deemed insufficient justification, as both partners were involved in the firm&#039;s operations, and alternative actions could have been taken. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of providing valid and justifiable reasons for seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings, highlighting that personal reasons like pregnancy and childcare responsibilities may not be adequate grounds for condoning significant delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 06:52:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 233 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252099</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Condonation of Delay application and dismissed the appeal as time-barred. The appellant&#039;s plea of pregnancy and childbirth causing the delay was deemed insufficient justification, as both partners were involved in the firm&#039;s operations, and alternative actions could have been taken. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of providing valid and justifiable reasons for seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings, highlighting that personal reasons like pregnancy and childcare responsibilities may not be adequate grounds for condoning significant delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>