<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 228 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252094</link>
    <description>Delay in filing an appeal against an order-in-original was examined on the basis of the explanation offered for the 159-day lapse. The reasons for delay were found unsatisfactory, but relief was still considered appropriate in the interests of justice, with condonation made conditional on payment of costs. The delay was accordingly condoned subject to costs, and the matter was directed to proceed before the Tribunal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 06:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 228 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252094</link>
      <description>Delay in filing an appeal against an order-in-original was examined on the basis of the explanation offered for the 159-day lapse. The reasons for delay were found unsatisfactory, but relief was still considered appropriate in the interests of justice, with condonation made conditional on payment of costs. The delay was accordingly condoned subject to costs, and the matter was directed to proceed before the Tribunal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>