<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 207 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer (AO) had adequately examined and approved the deduction under Section 10AA after thorough verification. The Tribunal deemed the AO&#039;s decision supported by judicial precedents and a plausible view, thus finding the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) unjustified in invoking jurisdiction under Section 263. Consequently, the Tribunal overturned the CIT&#039;s order and ruled in favor of the assessee for both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 207 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer (AO) had adequately examined and approved the deduction under Section 10AA after thorough verification. The Tribunal deemed the AO&#039;s decision supported by judicial precedents and a plausible view, thus finding the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) unjustified in invoking jurisdiction under Section 263. Consequently, the Tribunal overturned the CIT&#039;s order and ruled in favor of the assessee for both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>