<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 205 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directs the appellant to ensure the tenant executes the surety bond in the correct format accepted by the competent authority before the President of India through the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner. The case is adjourned for four weeks to complete the surety bond formalities, with the stay petitions scheduled for listing on 30.09.2014 for further proceedings regarding the service tax demand confirmation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 205 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directs the appellant to ensure the tenant executes the surety bond in the correct format accepted by the competent authority before the President of India through the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner. The case is adjourned for four weeks to complete the surety bond formalities, with the stay petitions scheduled for listing on 30.09.2014 for further proceedings regarding the service tax demand confirmation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>