<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 185 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252051</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s application for restoration and setting aside of earlier orders due to repeated absence and lack of diligence in prosecuting the appeal. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s failure to take advantage of opportunities granted. The dismissal was without costs, highlighting the importance of diligence in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 185 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252051</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s application for restoration and setting aside of earlier orders due to repeated absence and lack of diligence in prosecuting the appeal. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s failure to take advantage of opportunities granted. The dismissal was without costs, highlighting the importance of diligence in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>