<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1301 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166564</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction may be declined where a reassessment challenge turns on mixed questions of fact and law concerning the taxability of charges linked to sale and delivery. The document notes that the dispute involved whether supply, handling, high lifting, transportation and loading charges formed part of sale consideration under VAT law or amounted to taxable service under the Finance Act, 1994. Because the character of freight collection, ownership and risk till delivery required factual examination, the proper course was to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The challenge to reassessment was therefore left for determination before the appellate forum, with all contentions kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:37:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1301 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166564</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction may be declined where a reassessment challenge turns on mixed questions of fact and law concerning the taxability of charges linked to sale and delivery. The document notes that the dispute involved whether supply, handling, high lifting, transportation and loading charges formed part of sale consideration under VAT law or amounted to taxable service under the Finance Act, 1994. Because the character of freight collection, ownership and risk till delivery required factual examination, the proper course was to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The challenge to reassessment was therefore left for determination before the appellate forum, with all contentions kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>