<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1340 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166561</link>
    <description>VAT registration could be cancelled only for good and sufficient reason and after the dealer was given a reasonable opportunity of being heard under section 19(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Because the show-cause notice was not served before cancellation and no prior hearing was afforded, the mandatory statutory procedure was not complied with. The cancellation was therefore contrary to the Act and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1340 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166561</link>
      <description>VAT registration could be cancelled only for good and sufficient reason and after the dealer was given a reasonable opportunity of being heard under section 19(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Because the show-cause notice was not served before cancellation and no prior hearing was afforded, the mandatory statutory procedure was not complied with. The cancellation was therefore contrary to the Act and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>