<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1339 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166554</link>
    <description>A State Government notification reducing CST on inter-State sales of paper was applied to the assessee, and the benefit could not be denied merely because form D was produced instead of form C for sales to Government departments. The Tribunal treated the sales as inter-State sales, noted that the concessional rate had been consciously notified, and held that no declaration form C was required to claim the reduced rate. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to the notified concessional tax rate, and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1339 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166554</link>
      <description>A State Government notification reducing CST on inter-State sales of paper was applied to the assessee, and the benefit could not be denied merely because form D was produced instead of form C for sales to Government departments. The Tribunal treated the sales as inter-State sales, noted that the concessional rate had been consciously notified, and held that no declaration form C was required to claim the reduced rate. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to the notified concessional tax rate, and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>