<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1338 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166552</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the assessment order and demand notice issued by the Revenue. The decision was based on the analysis of a previous judgment highlighting the taxation classification of aluminium plain sheets. The court found the revisional authority&#039;s decision unsustainable in law and facts, concluding that the sheets should have been taxed at four percent. The Revenue conceded to the petitioners&#039; arguments, leading to the court ruling in favor of the petitioners based on the precedent set in the earlier judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1338 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166552</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the assessment order and demand notice issued by the Revenue. The decision was based on the analysis of a previous judgment highlighting the taxation classification of aluminium plain sheets. The court found the revisional authority&#039;s decision unsustainable in law and facts, concluding that the sheets should have been taxed at four percent. The Revenue conceded to the petitioners&#039; arguments, leading to the court ruling in favor of the petitioners based on the precedent set in the earlier judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>